|
Culture
Sensitivity
Changing Organisations
- Achieving a Cultural Fit
Alka
Bakaya,
Senior Instructional Designer, The Business Workshop
A small organisation growing
and expanding into a medium sized one, mergers of two extremely
different businesses or even a sudden increase in employee turnover
are all very common circumstances that organisations are faced
with today. What is common amongst these very different occurrences?
The fact is that
these changes within organisations can result in a change in
organisational culture, which in turn demands that the employees
adjust to this changed culture.
Is adjusting to this
change traumatic? Is it the truth that any employee who cannot
make this adjustment easily is a failure?
Here are some myths
about coping with change that colour the perceptions of many
mangers and businesses as quoted from Managing at the speed
of change - Daryl R. Conner.
- Change will always
be mismanaged.
- Organisational efficiency
and effectiveness inevitably decrease when changes are attempted.
- Those who help you
implement change are heroes and those who resist are villains.
- Management is inherently
insensitive to problems caused during implementation of change.
- Employees are prone
to resist any change that is good for the business.
Some messages are so
well entrenched within our psyches, that it almost makes it impossible
for change to be introduced and for it to be implemented within
an organisation.
In reality, however,
the management and the employees are equally committed to the
improvement of business and for the well being of the organisation.
It is for exactly this common goal, that the culture of the organisation
changes, to incorporate the new adjustments that individuals
have to make.
For example, an organisation
that grows suddenly may have to undergo a cultural change from
an extremely laissez-faire and informal management style
to a slightly more formal reporting structure and a more accountable
performance management system. However, the organisation may
still retain the quality of appreciating and rewarding independence
and creativity, which was inherent in its culture.
Similarly, amalgamation
of two very different cultures is an even bigger challenge to
reckon with. They bring with them not only different policies
and means of operating, but also people who are engaged in certain
patterns of relationships that are almost rigid in their dynamics.
Thus, for the employees to establish a new pattern of interactions
is an extremely traumatic circumstance. For the management, helping
the creation of a new culture, which not only helps people adjust
to it, but also evolve within it to better organisational performance
goals, is a herculean task. It is no surprise that one hears
of failed mergers so very often in the market place.
Therefore, what is
the solution to this humongous task ahead. I would believe the
first step is to recognize that the task is truly herculean.
Only when you accept that the impact is extremely strong can
you plan for all eventualites. Also, it will help management
focus on sensitivity to employees trauma and for the employees
to accept that this is an uphill task for the management as well.
The next step is to
accept that an organisations culture is more permanent and bigger
than the change being introduced. Even if the culture does evolve
to accept the change it still cannot change completely to adapt
to a change that is diametrically opposite to its own dynamics.
Thus, in short culture shall prevail.
Thus, changes within
organisations have to be planned and introduced in a manner that
is not extremely opposing the current culture. If at all changes
countering it are introduced, then the culture should have changed
and evolved to adjust to it. The management and the employees
are tuned to making this evolution and 'achieving a cultural
fit'.
Graphic
done by Sophiya

|